Sortino & Downside Risk
Sharpe punishes upside volatility too. Sortino fixes that by counting only the losses.
The Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk only. is a refinement of SharpeReturn per unit of risk — the standard risk-adjusted measure. that fixes one of its biggest flaws. It measures return per unit of downside risk only — using the volatilityThe size of price swings — not their direction. of losses (downside deviationVolatility of only the negative returns.) in the denominator, instead of total volatilityThe size of price swings — not their direction..
- The fix — uses downside deviation (volatilityThe size of price swings — not their direction. of losses) only, instead of total volatilityThe size of price swings — not their direction..
- Why it’s fairer — it stops penalising upside volatilityThe size of price swings — not their direction., which isn’t risk anyone fears.
- Best for — asymmetric strategies (e.g. trendThe prevailing direction of price: up, down or sideways.-following) with rare large gains that SharpeReturn per unit of risk — the standard risk-adjusted measure. unfairly punishes.
- Read alongside SharpeReturn per unit of risk — the standard risk-adjusted measure. — a much higher SortinoReturn per unit of downside risk only. than SharpeReturn per unit of risk — the standard risk-adjusted measure. signals positively-skewed (good) upside.
Should I use Sharpe or Sortino?
Use both — they answer slightly different questions. Sharpe penalises all volatility (useful as a conservative, widely-understood benchmark); Sortino isolates downside risk (fairer for strategies with upside skew). A big gap between them is informative: Sortino ≫ Sharpe means the “risk” Sharpe saw was mostly upside. Neither replaces looking at drawdown and tail risk directly.