ITR-3, 44AD and the Audit Question
Which return to file, when presumptive taxation helps, and the opt-out trap that actually causes trader audits.
A trader’s compliance stack has three decisions: which ITR (business income → ITR-3, or ITR-4 with presumptive), whether to use Section 44AD presumptive taxation (declare a flat 6% of digital turnover as profit, skip books), and whether an audit applies. Most retail traders can be fully compliant in an afternoon — if they know which doors to walk through.
- ITR-3 — the default for F&OA contract whose value is derived from an underlying asset./intradayBuying and selling within the same trading day.: actual P&LA record of revenue, costs and profit over a period., expense deductions, loss carry-forward; needs basic books (your brokerAn intermediary licensed to execute your trades. statements largely ARE them).
- 44AD presumptive — declare ≥6% of turnover as deemed profit, no books, ITR-4: worth it ONLY when actual profit ≥6% (else you overpay) — and it kills loss carry-forward.
- Audit at ₹10 crore turnover (digital trades) — rare for retail.
- THE trap: use 44AD once, then exit it (e.g. to declare a loss) within 5 years while income exceeds the exemption limit → audit mandated. Opt in only if you expect to stay.
- On-time filing (usually July 31, non-audit) is what preserves every loss carry-forward.
Test yourselfYear 1: ₹8 lakh turnover, ₹90,000 profit — you used 44AD (declared 6%). Year 2: ₹12 lakh turnover, ₹2 lakh LOSS. What is the catch in reporting the loss?
Do I need a CA to file as a trader?
For plain ITR-3 with broker-reported P&L: many traders self-file (brokers’ tax reports map nearly line-to-line), and platforms like Cleartax/Quicko have F&O flows. Engage a CA when: an audit applies, you are exiting 44AD, you have multiple business incomes, or the carry-forward stakes are large. A ₹5-15K CA fee against a preserved ₹3 lakh loss carry-forward is arithmetic, not philosophy.