Felt Risk vs Actual Risk
Markets feel riskiest at the bottom, when they are often safest. Decoupling feeling from fact.
One of the cruellest tricks markets play is that felt risk and actual risk move in opposite directions. The market feels most dangerous exactly when it’s often safest, and feels safest exactly when it’s often most dangerous. Decoupling the feeling from the fact is essential to surviving drawdowns.
- The inversion — felt risk peaks at bottoms (assets actually cheaper/safer) and bottoms at tops (actually pricier/riskier).
- Why — after a crash everything feels terrifying though prices are lower and forward risk often reduced; after a rally it feels safe though risk is elevated.
- Implication — your feelings are a *contrarianGoing against the crowd’s prevailing sentiment.* indicator: max fearThe two emotions that move markets and ruin accounts. ≈ opportunity, max comfort ≈ danger.
- The defence — separate feeling from fact; when most afraid to invest, check if prices are actually cheaper, and follow your plan.
How do I act against my feelings when a crash is terrifying?
Rely on systems decided in calm, not in-the-moment courage: a written plan that pre-specifies crash behaviour, automated SIPs that keep buying, and scheduled rebalancing that mechanically buys the dip. Recognise that the terror itself is a sign you may be near a bottom (felt risk peaking). You don’t need to *feel* brave — you need rules that act correctly while you feel afraid.